Mekelle፡Telaviv, Nairobi, Pretoria, London, (Tigray Herald)
Echoes of History and the Rebirth of Tigray: Political Transformation and New State in the Horn of Africa
By Gidey Gebreegziabher, PhD Candidate in Archaeology University of Warsaw
1. Introduction
1.1. The Significance of Tigray in the Horn of Africa
Tigray, situated in northern Ethiopia, has long played a pivotal role in the political and cultural landscape of the Horn of Africa. Historically, it was the heart of the Aksumite Empire (c. 100–940 CE), a highly influential civilization renowned for its commercial prowess, advanced currency system, and monumental architecture.
The Aksumite rulers facilitated trade between Mediterranean and Indian Ocean economies, solidifying Tigray’s legacy as a hub of early African statehood. Additionally, the region’s deep-rooted connection to Ethiopia’s Orthodox Christian tradition remains a defining feature of its identity. However, Tigray’s modern trajectory has been characterized by recurrent conflicts, most notably the Tigray War (2020–2022), which underscored significant flaws in Ethiopia’s ethnic federalist structure and reignited discussions about regional autonomy.
The strategic positioning of Tigray bordering Eritrea, Sudan, and the Red Sea corridor—has further drawn regional and international interest, particularly from Eritrea’s leadership and Gulf States with vested geopolitical stakes (Clapham, 2017; ICG, 2021).Tigray’s cultural heritage, anchored in the Tigrinya language and the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, has fostered a strong sense of identity among its people.
However, this distinctiveness has also contributed to political alienation from Ethiopia’s central government. Mid-20th-century policies implemented under Emperor Haile Selassie favored Amhara elites, leading to the marginalization of Tigrayan political figures and exacerbating regional tensions.
This long-standing exclusion helped galvanize the emergence of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), an organization committed to securing political representation and selfdetermination for the region.
Tigray’s ongoing struggle for autonomy or independence highlights broader post-colonial challenges in Africa, particularly the difficulty of balancing ethnic sovereignty with national unity (Young, 1997; Aalen, 2011).The historical significance of Tigray is closely tied to its role as the core of the Aksumite Empire, one of Africa’s most advanced civilizations.
Flourishing between the 1st and 10th centuries CE, Aksum was distinguished by its extensive trade networks, coinage system, and architectural innovations. The towering stelae of Axum, still standing today, remains a testament to the engineering capabilities of the period (Munro-Hay, 1991).
Furthermore, under King Ezana’s leadership in the 4th century, the Aksumite Empire adopted Christianity centuries before many European nations cementing Tigray’s central place within Ethiopia’s Orthodox Christian tradition.Geopolitically, Tigray’s proximity to Eritrea, Sudan, and the Red Sea corridor places it at the crossroads of regional power struggles.
Control over this territory enables access to key trade routes and strategic chokepoints such as the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. Eritrea, as well as influential Gulf States like the UAE and Saudi Arabia, view Tigray as a critical player in their broader geopolitical ambitions (Clapham, 2017; ICG, 2021).
This complex dynamic has made Tigray both a contested prize and a battleground, shaping its modern fate and international significance. In the contemporary era, Tigray’s role in Ethiopian politics has become increasingly contentious. The outbreak of war in November 2020 magnified the fragility of Ethiopia’s ethnic federalism and underscored the persistent tensions between regional and national governance.
Tigray’s pursuit of self-governance or full independence echoes broader African dilemmas where the principles of self-determination frequently collide with the imperatives of maintaining national unity in states burdened by historically arbitrary borders (Aalen, 2011).
1.2. Scope and Methodology
This study takes a multidisciplinary approach, integrating archival research, oral testimonies, and geopolitical analysis to explore Tigray’s historical transformation from an ancient kingdom to a contemporary conflict zone. It relies on primary sources such as TPLF communiqués, Ethiopian state archives, and interviews conducted with displaced Tigrayans by organizations like the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission (EHRC, 2021). Additionally, statistical data from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) quantifies the humanitarian impact of recent conflicts.
The analysis is further enriched by theoretical frameworks drawn from comparative studies on secessionism, particularly cases like South Sudan and Somaliland, as well as conflict resolution models proposed by scholars such as William Zartman (1995). Through the intersection of historical narratives and contemporary policy discussions, this work seeks to challenge simplistic interpretations of the Tigray crisis as merely ethnic or ideological.
Employing both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies, this study utilizes a triangulated approach, incorporating archival documents, field interviews, and conflict databases to provide a comprehensive understanding of Tigray’s historical and geopolitical significance.
Ancient inscriptions, religious texts, and accounts from European explorers like Henry Salt (1814) serve as key historical sources in reconstructing Tigray’s past. Meanwhile, modern insights derive from primary documents such as resolutions issued by Ethiopia’s federal government and communiqués from the TPLF. Reports from human rights agencies, notably the EHRC (2021), offer crucial perspectives on civilian experiences amid the war, while ACLED’s displacement and fatality statistics provide empirical grounding for assessing the humanitarian toll.
The study’s theoretical foundation draws upon scholarship in ethnic conflict, separatist movements, and conflict resolution strategies. Examining parallel cases such as South Sudan’s independence in 2011 and Somaliland’s prolonged pursuit of international recognition allows for a comparative assessment of Tigray’s own aspirations for self-governance. Notably, conflict resolution models introduced by William Zartman (1995), including the concept of a “hurting stalemate,” are instrumental in analyzing the conditions under which peace agreements such as the 2022 Pretoria Accord might achieve lasting success.
Furthermore, oral histories collected from displaced Tigrayans by NGOs and international monitoring agencies add an indispensable human dimension to this study. These testimonies not only document personal hardships but also provide insight into shifting perspectives on Ethiopian national identity, federalism, and Tigray’s political future. By integrating these personal narratives into the broader academic discourse, the study captures the complex interplay between historical grievances, political aspirations, and evolving regional dynamics.
Through this synthesis of historical, theoretical, empirical, and testimonial evidence, the book presents a nuanced portrayal of Tigray’s past and present while contemplating its potential futures. Rather than viewing the crisis through a reductionist lens, the study encourages a more layered understanding of the forces shaping Tigray’s trajectory in Ethiopia and the wider Horn of Africa.
2.Historical Foundations: Ancient and Medieval Tigray
The Aksumite Empire, centered in present-day Tigray, was one of Africa’s most advanced precolonial states. Its rulers, including King Ezana (320–360 CE), embraced Christianity centuries before European nations did, shaping a distinct fusion of African and Semitic traditions.
The empire’s renowned stelae massive obelisks symbolizing royal power serve as a testament to its architectural excellence, while the Ge’ez script remains in use as a liturgical language within the Ethiopian Orthodox Church (Munro-Hay, 1991). Although Aksum’s decline in the 10th century led to political fragmentation, its legacy persisted through the Zagwe and Solomonic dynasties, both of which traced their lineage to Aksumite rulers. By the 16th century, Tigray became a contested territory between Christian highlanders and the Islamic Adal Sultanate, a struggle memorialized in the Kebra Nagast (“Glory of Kings”).
The region’s monasteries, such as Debre Damo, safeguarded valuable manuscripts, which later contributed to Ethiopia’s burgeoning nationalism in the 19th century. European explorers, including Henry Salt (1814), noted Tigray’s strategic significance and its role in trade routes linking Massawa to Gondar. These historical narratives have fueled modern Tigrayan perceptions of civilizational uniqueness, a notion that gained prominence during the rise of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) (Tibebu, 1995).
The Aksumite Empire’s historical influence is deeply embedded in Tigray’s identity. Emerging around the 1st century CE and thriving until its decline in the 10th century, Aksum was distinguished by its economic and cultural sophistication.
The empire minted its own currency in gold, silver, and bronze, highlighting its integration into global trade networks that spanned the Roman Empire, India, and Arabia (Munro-Hay, 1991). This commercial success fostered urban growth and literacy, with scholars and scribes using the indigenous Ge’ez script an ancient Semitic writing system that remains central to Ethiopian religious texts (Phillipson, 2012).A defining feature of Aksum was its early adoption of Christianity. King Ezana’s conversion in the 4th century positioned Aksum as one of the first states globally to embrace Christianity as its official religion well before the Roman Empire’s own conversion.
This historical fact challenges Eurocentric perspectives on religious dissemination. The empire’s inscriptions, found in Ge’ez, Greek, and Sabaean, reflect a diverse polity that blended African, Mediterranean, and Arabian influences. Tigray’s enduring Christian heritage, rooted in the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, continues to be expressed through unique traditions like the Ark-centered liturgy and monastic institutions (Kaplan, 2004).Following Aksum’s decline, Tigray maintained its religious and cultural prominence despite political fragmentation.
The Zagwe dynasty (c. 900–1270 CE) carried forward Aksumite traditions, governing from Lalibela and emphasizing religious legitimacy rather than Solomonic descent. Tigray remained integral to Ethiopia’s highland religious institutions, reinforcing its historical significance. The rise of the Solomonic dynasty in the 13th century, which claimed descent from the union of King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba, reinforced Tigray’s status as Ethiopia’s spiritual and historical epicenter.
The Kebra Nagast (“The Glory of Kings”) solidified this narrative, intertwining Tigray with Ethiopia’s royal mythology (Henze, 2000).In the early modern era, Tigray’s leadership represented by powerful feudal lords or “Rases”retained considerable autonomy within the Ethiopian empire. The rugged terrain and strong warrior tradition fostered a decentralized political system where local rulers often defied imperial authority and maintained independent militias.
This history of semi-autonomy influenced Tigray’s modern political stance, particularly its resistance to centralized governance from Addis Ababa. Additionally, 20th-century nationalist intellectuals increasingly invoked Aksum’s legacy to justify aspirations for greater self-governance or outright independence. These deep-seated historical narratives, often overlooked in broader Ethiopian historiography, continue to shape contemporary Tigrayan consciousness and political discourse (Tibebu, 1995; Crummey, 2000).
The Tigray-Ethiopia Nexus (TPLF Era,1991–2018)
The Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) emerged from Ethiopia’s turbulent revolutionary period in the 1970s, establishing itself as a vanguard movement against the military dictatorship of the Derg. Initially driven by Marxist-Leninist ideology, the TPLF mobilized Tigrayan farmers and intellectuals who had suffered under Mengistu Haile Mariam’s brutal land collectivization policies.
By the late 1980s, the group had evolved into a highly organized military force, spearheading the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF), which overthrew Mengistu’s regime in 1991. This victory placed Tigray’s leadership at the center of Ethiopia’s new political order and set the stage for the implementation of ethnic federalism (Young, 1997).Once in power, the TPLF-led EPRDF introduced a federal system designed to decentralize governance along ethnic lines.
Ethiopia’s new constitution, ratified in 1995, granted regions significant autonomy, including the right to secede an unprecedented provision in African statehood debates (Art. 39, FDRE Constitution, 1995). Though this framework ostensibly aimed to accommodate Ethiopia’s diverse population, it effectively reinforced regional divisions.
Tigray, despite comprising just 6% of Ethiopia’s population, became disproportionately influential within the central government. The TPLF controlled security apparatuses, economic planning, and intelligence institutions, directing state resources into Tigrayan-led conglomerates such as the Endowment Fund for the Rehabilitation of Tigray (EFFORT) (Aregawi, 2009).
Economic policies under Prime Minister Meles Zenawi, who governed from 1995 until his death in 2012, transformed Ethiopia into a model of state-led development. The country experienced rapid growth, with GDP increasing at an average annual rate of 10%, bolstered by investments in agriculture, infrastructure, and energy.
However, this economic success concealed authoritarian practices. Political opposition was systematically suppressed through restrictive laws such as the 2009 Charities and Societies Proclamation, while independent media faced severe censorship.
The violent crackdown on protests following the contested 2005 elections further alienated urban Ethiopians and accelerated the rise of ethno-nationalist movements like the Oromo Liberation Front (Tronvoll, 2010).Tigray’s dominance in Ethiopia’s political and military sectors, though beneficial for its internal development, fomented resentment among other ethnic groups.
The concentration of power in the hands of TPLF elites fueled accusations of economic favoritism, particularly regarding the allocation of government contracts and foreign investments. Critics contended that this arrangement constituted an “ethnic oligarchy,” prioritizing Tigrayan interests at the expense of national cohesion (Vaughan, 2011).
These grievances gradually undermined the EPRDF’s legitimacy, exacerbating tensions that culminated in widespread protests and calls for political reform.Meles Zenawi’s tenure also shaped Ethiopia’s foreign policy, particularly in relation to Eritrea.
The 1998–2000 war over the disputed town of Badme led to tens of thousands of casualties and entrenched hostility between the two nations. Although the Algiers Agreement (2000) ruled in favor of Eritrea’s territorial claims, Ethiopia, under TPLF leadership, refused to withdraw from Badme.
This diplomatic impasse sustained military tensions and contributed to Ethiopia’s reputation as an aggressive regional power (Plaut, 2016; Clapham, 2006). Additionally, Ethiopia’s intervention in Somalia in 2006, intended to dismantle the Islamic Courts Union, further solidified perceptions of Ethiopian expansionism.
Following Meles’s death in 2012, the TPLF struggled to maintain its authority within the EPRDF. His successor, Hailemariam Desalegn, lacked both the strategic acumen and political legitimacy to navigate Ethiopia’s growing ethno-nationalist movements. Widespread protests in Oromia and Amhara regions, driven by land disputes and economic exclusion, escalated into violent confrontations, forcing the government to declare a national state of emergency in 2016.
Meanwhile, internal divisions within the EPRDF weakened the cohesion of the ruling coalition, making the political landscape increasingly unstable.The appointment of Abiy Ahmed as prime minister in 2018 marked the beginning of a dramatic shift in Ethiopia’s governance. Abiy’s reforms sought to dismantle the TPLF’s entrenched power structure, dissolving the EPRDF and consolidating ethnic factions into the new Prosperity Party.
This move effectively marginalized the TPLF, which retreated to Tigray, viewing Abiy’s administration as hostile to its interests. The growing animosity between the federal government and Tigray’s leadership reached a breaking point in November 2020 when the Ethiopian military launched an offensive against TPLF forces, initiating a brutal two-year conflict (de Waal, 2018).For many Tigrayans, the TPLF’s reign remains a paradox, a period of relative prosperity and infrastructural advancement, overshadowed by authoritarianism and political isolation.
The legacy of ethnic federalism, initially framed as a solution to Ethiopia’s complex demographic realities, has instead intensified fragmentation. The Tigray War (2020–2022) underscored deep-rooted disputes over governance, territorial integrity, and self-determination, demonstrating that the policies implemented during the TPLF’s tenure continue to shape Ethiopia’s fragile stability (Aregawi, 2009; Vaughan, 2011).
4. War, Crisis, and International Response (2020–2022)
The Tigray War erupted in November 2020, following a dramatic escalation of tensions between Ethiopia’s federal government and the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF).
Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed accused the TPLF of attacking the Ethiopian National Defense Force’s (ENDF) Northern Command stationed in Tigray, prompting a military offensive by federal forces. The TPLF, however, justified its actions as a preemptive move against an impending federal invasion.
The origins of this conflict trace back to political changes initiated by Abiy in 2019, particularly the dissolution of the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) in favor of the centralized Prosperity Party—a transition that the TPLF rejected as unconstitutional. The war’s outbreak was further precipitated by Tigray’s unilateral decision to hold its own regional elections in September 2020, which Addis Ababa declared illegal (ICG, 2020; Gidey, 2025).
The conflict quickly expanded into a multi-front war with regional and international dimensions. Eritrea, led by Isaias Afwerki, sent troops across the border to support Ethiopia’s offensive, reviving historical animosities between Eritreans and Tigrayans. Meanwhile, Amhara regional forces moved into western Tigray, citing long-standing territorial disputes over fertile land such as Wolkait and Humera.
The war soon devolved into a humanitarian crisis, as civilian casualties mounted and atrocities were documented by human rights organizations. Reports from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch confirmed mass killings, sexual violence, and looting in towns such as Axum and Mai Kadra (Amnesty International, 2021; HRW, 2022).
The federal government imposed a blockade on Tigray, cutting off essential services, communications, and aid deliveries, prompting warnings of famine from UN agencies.Despite being severely outgunned, the TPLF mounted an unexpected counteroffensive in mid2021, reclaiming Mekelle and advancing into parts of Amhara and Afar. The group rebranded itself as the Tigray Defense Forces (TDF), attracting seasoned fighters and mobilizing local support.
The Ethiopian military, weakened by years of internal purges and politicization, struggled to mount an effective defense. To counter the TDF’s advances, the federal government declared a nationwide state of emergency and enlisted irregular militias, some of whom engaged in retaliatory attacks against ethnic Tigrayans outside the battlefield. In late 2021, Turkish-supplied Bayraktar drones, reportedly provided by Türkiye and the UAE, played a decisive role in reversing TDF territorial gains, allowing federal forces to repel advances toward Addis Ababa (Reuters, 2022).
The war’s impact extended beyond Ethiopia, drawing neighboring Sudan into border clashes over disputed farmland in Al-Fashaga. Eritrean forces, operating independently from Ethiopian command, continued attacks deep into Tigrayan territory. The African Union’s response was largely ineffective, hampered by its principle of non-interference and Ethiopia’s strategic position as the AU’s headquarters.
Western countries criticized the violence but hesitated to impose decisive sanctions, fearing broader instability in the Horn of Africa and disruptions to counterterrorism efforts. Meanwhile, China and Russia blocked UN Security Council resolutions aimed at investigating war crimes or establishing humanitarian corridors, further complicating international intervention (Berhe, 2023).
The human toll of the conflict was staggering. By 2022, estimates placed the death toll at over 600,000, with more than 2.6 million displaced and over 5 million requiring urgent food aid (WHO, 2022). Reports from humanitarian organizations highlighted famine conditions exacerbated by the federal blockade, which Amnesty International characterized as a deliberate strategy to force Tigray into submission.
Entire communities were uprooted, with displaced people facing dire shortages of medical care, clean water, and shelter. Satellite imagery revealed the systematic destruction of infrastructure, including hospitals and schools, further deepening the region’s isolation. By mid-2022, exhaustion from prolonged warfare, coupled with mounting international pressure, pushed both sides toward negotiations. However, deep-seated mistrust and unresolved territorial disputes complicated peace efforts.
Inside Tigray, public sentiment hardened against reconciliation unless clear guarantees of security and territorial restoration were established. The federal government, for its part, sought an end to the conflict but remained wary of TPLF’s long-term political ambitions. Mediation efforts by the African Union and United Nations struggled to gain traction, largely due to perceptions of bias and limited enforcement mechanisms.
The war exposed Ethiopia’s fragile governance structure, highlighting the risks of ethnic federalism and unresolved historical grievances. Far from resolving Ethiopia’s deep political divisions, the conflict exacerbated ethnic polarization, with tensions between Amhara, Oromo, and Tigrayan communities intensifying.
The Prosperity Party’s consolidation efforts under Abiy Ahmed failed to foster national unity, as competing ethnic factions remained distrustful of central authority. The continued militarization of Ethiopian politics raised concerns about future instability, with analysts warning that unresolved territorial disputes could reignite conflicts in Tigray and other regions.Moreover, the geopolitical ramifications of the war underscored how external actors shape internal conflicts when strategic interests outweigh humanitarian concerns.
The involvement of regional and global powers, whether through direct military assistance or diplomatic maneuvering,illustrated the broader contest for influence in the Horn of Africa. As Ethiopia sought to recover from the war’s devastation, the lingering effects of international meddling, unresolved governance issues, and deep-seated ethnic rivalries remained formidable obstacles to lasting peace and stability.
5.Rebirth and the Quest for Statehood
The Pretoria Agreement, signed on November 2, 2022, represented a critical effort to end the active phase of the Tigray War, yet it left crucial political questions unresolved. Mediated by the African Union (AU) and supported by international partners, the accord required the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) to disarm, restored federal government control over Tigray’s borders, and ensured humanitarian aid access.
However, the agreement’s structural weaknesses became evident immediately. Eritrea, whose forces remained deeply embedded in northern Tigray, was excluded from negotiations, raising doubts about enforcement. Additionally, Amhara militias, having seized territory during the war, refused to withdraw from western Tigray, arguing that regions such as Wolkait and Humera historically belong to Amhara (ICG, 2023).
While TPLF leaders complied with key provisions by surrendering heavy weaponry in 2023, they retained smaller arms, citing continued threats from Eritrean troops stationed in Tigray. The region’s reconstruction remains largely stagnant due to financial and political constraints. International aid, previously promised for recovery efforts, faced delays and mismanagement.
Ethiopia’s federal government controversially redirected $2.1 billion in aid funds meant for Tigray to service national debt instead, exacerbating the crisis and prompting condemnation from international donors (World Bank, 2023). Meanwhile, frustrations have intensified within Tigray’s interim administration, which struggles to maintain unity in the face of pressure from proindependence factions such as Salsay Weyane Tigray (SWT).
These groups advocate for outright sovereignty, arguing that Tigray should no longer be bound by Ethiopia’s “colonial-era borders” (Tigray Broadcasting Network, 2023).Humanitarian conditions in Tigray remain dire despite partial implementation of the ceasefire. Although aid shipments resumed after the Pretoria Agreement, they have been sporadic, often impeded by bureaucratic obstacles and allegations of theft.
The World Food Program and USAID suspended food aid to Ethiopia in 2023 after uncovering large-scale diversion of humanitarian supplies, leaving millions of Tigrayans in severe food insecurity (WFP, 2023). Critical infrastructure, including healthcare, education, and banking services, remains in ruins, with minimal federal support for reconstruction.
The scarcity of essential resources has compounded the suffering of war survivors, particularly displaced populations who face extreme shortages of shelter and medical assistance.Politically, Tigray’s interim leadership, under Getachew Reda, faces mounting challenges in balancing negotiations with Addis Ababa while addressing local grievances.
Although the Pretoria Agreement formally reintegrated Tigray into Ethiopia’s political framework, many Tigrayans view the deal with skepticism. Growing calls for independence reflect a broader disillusionment with the federal system, as nationalist factions frame Tigray’s autonomy as necessary for survival.
The independence movement draws parallels to South Sudan’s 2011 referendum, arguing that Ethiopia’s ethnic federalism has failed to protect Tigrayans’ rights and security. The interim administration, caught between engaging with federal authorities and appeasing domestic separatist demands, must navigate an increasingly volatile political landscape (Tigray Broadcasting Network, 2023).
Ultimately, the Pretoria Agreement has not resolved Ethiopia’s broader governance dilemmas, particularly regarding territorial disputes and ethnic federalism. While the ceasefire has prevented further bloodshed, reconciliation remains elusive.
The Ethiopian constitution permits secession under Article 39, which Tigrayan leaders increasingly cite as a possible avenue for sovereignty. Addis Ababa, however, remains firmly opposed to any fragmentation of the state. As the AU and other international actors push for “national dialogue,” their efforts risk being perceived as symbolic rather than substantive unless issues such as territorial control and the withdrawal of foreign forces are addressed. Tigray now finds itself in an uncertain state not fully at war, yet far from genuine peace.
6. The Future of Tigray and the Horn
Ethiopia’s ethnic federalism, instituted by the 1995 constitution, was intended to empower diverse nationalities but has instead deepened ethnic divisions, entrenched patronage, and spurred separatist movements. The Tigray War (2020–2022) exposed the fragility of this system, showing that it failed to ensure either regional autonomy or national unity.
Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s Prosperity Party has since prioritized centralization, asserting that unity requires strong central governance. However, this move has sparked resistance from Oromo and Somali elites, who view it as undermining long-fought rights to self-rule (Tronvoll & Gedamu, 2022).
The crisis extends beyond federalism. Once a symbol of African resistance to colonialism, Ethiopia now faces internal fragmentation. Ethnic federalism, especially Article 39’s promise of selfdetermination, has instead fostered identity-based competition and weakened institutions. The Tigray War highlighted how elite-driven ethnic grievances can ignite large-scale conflict, demonstrating that Ethiopia’s federation rests on fragile political bargains rather than trust (Tronvoll & Aalen, 2022).
Post-Pretoria Agreement (2022), Abiy’s government has pushed a pan-Ethiopian agenda, alienating groups like the Oromo. Disillusionment has grown, with the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA) continuing its insurgency and Amhara militias refusing to disarm, clashing with federal forces throughout 2023–2024 (Addis Standard, 2024).The 2024 national elections have become highly contested. Delayed due to regional insecurity, the elections face criticism over fairness and feasibility. Opposition parties demand that transitional justice precede voting.
The government’s plan to hold elections in only “stable” areas has fueled a legitimacy crisis. The NEBE and international actors like the EU EOM have urged reforms before the elections proceed (NEBE, 2024; EU EOM, 2024).Ethiopia increasingly shows signs of state failure, including ineffective conflict mediation and widespread ethnic violence.
The federal government struggles to resolve disputes such as those between Afar and Somali or Benishangul-Gumuz and Amhara. Human rights organizations report mass atrocities and displacements. International responses remain muted China and Russia uphold state sovereignty, while Western actors are accused of inconsistent engagement (de Waal, 2023; HRW, 2024).
Geopolitical tensions in the Horn complicate Ethiopia’s domestic turmoil. Gulf states like Saudi Arabia and the UAE have built military and economic footholds, while Egypt’s opposition to the GERD has deepened regional rivalries. Ethiopia’s instability threatens to spill across borders, unsettling regional alliances (Verhoeven, 2022).Despite growing uncertainty, civil society and religious leaders are advocating for national dialogue and constitutional reform. A shift from ethnicity to territorial federalism is gaining support, but meaningful change hinges on transitional justice and restoring public trust.
Ethiopia’s future depends not just on legal reform but on inclusive governance and reconciliation.Tigray’s crisis reflects deeper regional instability. Shared ethnic ties, porous borders, and unresolved grievances make the Horn highly vulnerable. How Ethiopia handles Tigray’s reintegration—or potential secession—will shape the region’s future. Rising support for independence among Tigrayans, particularly the youth, is driven by war trauma and disillusionment with both the TPLF and federal authorities.
Groups like Salsay Weyane Tigray advocate for a constitutional referendum, presenting legal and geopolitical challenges (Tigray Broadcasting Network, 2023; International Crisis Group, 2023).Tigrayan secession could inspire other separatist movements and destabilize neighboring states. Eritrea sees an independent Tigray as a threat, potentially prompting conflict, especially over the Red Sea corridor (Plaut, 2022). Sudan, already at odds with Ethiopia over Al-Fashaga, could align with Tigray, further complicating regional dynamics.
Foreign actors like the UAE and Türkiye—already involved in the Tigray conflict—might deepen their influence (Verhoeven, 2022).Internally, Tigray faces pressure for political reform. The TPLF is being challenged by civil society, youth movements, and diaspora activists. The interim government must navigate tensions between elite power structures and growing nationalist sentiment (Berhe, 2023).
The Horn’s fragility shows that elite pacts and military solutions cannot ensure peace. Long-term stability requires structural reform, inclusive governance, and proactive engagement from regional and international bodies like IGAD, the AU, and the UN. Justice, representation, and reconciliation must take priority over expedient diplomacy.
Ethiopia—and the broader Horn stands at a crossroads. The path forward hinges on leadership, public participation, and genuine efforts to address historic grievances. Without this, the region risks prolonged instability and foreign exploitation.
7. Conclusion: Tigray and the Reimagining of African Sovereignty
Tigray’s historical trajectory from its prominence as an imperial heartland to its modern status as a war-torn region encapsulates the fundamental dilemmas of African statecraft. The challenges of harmonizing ethnic plurality with national unity, sovereignty with self-determination, and development with justice are not unique to Ethiopia.
They are central to the broader African political landscape, where historical legacies, contested governance models, and unresolved territorial questions continue to shape the future of post-colonial states. Tigray’s role in the Horn of Africa is not marginal but pivotal; it is a space where history collides with contemporary geopolitics, forcing nations and institutions to reassess assumptions about governance and identity.
The Tigray War (2020–2022) was not simply a conflict between a rebellious region and the Ethiopian central government it was an existential crisis for Ethiopia’s post-1991 political model. The ethnic federalism promoted by the TPLF-led Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) aimed to provide self-rule for Ethiopia’s diverse ethno-linguistic groups. Yet, instead of fostering cohesion, this system institutionalized ethnic fragmentation, strengthened rival political networks, and created centrifugal forces that ultimately escalated into violent conflict.
The staggering human cost of the war hundreds of thousands of deaths, millions displaced, and a humanitarian disaster has permanently altered the Ethiopian state and left scars that extend beyond Tigray (Tronvoll & Aalen, 2022).Despite the devastation, Tigray’s story is also one of resilience. In the aftermath of war, Tigrayans have mobilized to demand accountability, push for reconstruction, and advocate for political recognition. Some have called for full independence, arguing that Ethiopia’s historical treatment of Tigray has been akin to colonial subjugation, marked by militarization, starvation, and systematic marginalization. Others seek greater autonomy within a reformed Ethiopian federation.
Meanwhile, attempts to restructure the TPLF itself suggest a growing awareness of the need for internal transformation and leadership accountability. These evolving political aspirations challenge long-standing continental norms, particularly the African Union’s principle of inviolable borders, and force reflection on the legitimacy of states that fail to protect their own citizens (Tigray Broadcasting Network, 2023; International Crisis Group, 2023).Tigray’s significance transcends Ethiopian borders; its future will directly influence the Horn of Africa’s political landscape.
Ethiopia remains at a crossroads, struggling to rebuild trust among its diverse ethnic communities in the wake of war. Neighboring states Eritrea, Sudan, and Somalia as well as external powers such as the Gulf States and Türkiye, continue to assess Tigray’s position through strategic lenses. Some view the region as a buffer zone, others as a threat, and still others as a potential ally.
The involvement of foreign actors during the war whether through military intervention or diplomatic maneuvering demonstrates how localized conflicts can escalate into larger geopolitical struggles (Verhoeven, 2022).This analysis has traced Tigray’s evolution across centuries, exploring its role from the heights of Aksumite civilization to the devastation of contemporary conflict. It has underscored the necessity of understanding Tigray not merely as an Ethiopian province but as a key site in the study of African sovereignty, state legitimacy, and governance models.
The Tigray crisis highlights critical issues confronting African states today: the unresolved legacies of imperial borders, the limitations of ethnicity-based governance, and the fragility of post-colonial statehood in the absence of inclusive political mechanisms (Berhe, 2023).Looking ahead, Tigray stands at an uncertain crossroads. The region could reintegrate into Ethiopia under a new federal structure, seek greater autonomy, or pursue outright independence. Each path comes with its own challenges, shaped by internal political debates and external pressures.
The trajectory Tigray follows will depend not only on the decisions of its political elites but on the voices and collective will of its people. Moreover, regional and global actors must play a constructive role, supporting an equitable and just peace rather than imposing external solutions that serve narrow interests (Plaut, 2022).Ultimately, Tigray’s story is emblematic of broader struggles over governance, inclusion, and national identity across Africa. Whether the region finds reconciliation within Ethiopia or charts a new political course, its experience offers valuable lessons for African states grappling with similar dilemmas.
The future of Tigray—and Ethiopia as a whole hinges on the ability of leaders and communities to forge a new political vision that prioritizes justice, representation, and stability. Without such commitments, the Horn of Africa risks further fragmentation, with long-term consequences not only for Ethiopia but for the continent.The end is yet to Come!
References
Aalen, L. (2011). The Politics of Ethnicity in Ethiopia: Actors, Power and Mobilization under Ethnic Federalism. Brill.
Addis Standard. (2024). Amhara Resistance to Disarmament: Clashes with Federal Troops Intensify. January 2024.
Amnesty International. (2021). Ethiopia: The Human Rights Crisis in Tigray.
Amnesty International. (2021). Ethiopia: Tigray Conflict Marked by Extreme Brutality.
Amnesty International. (2021). The Massacre in Axum. Retrieved from: www.amnesty.org
Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED). (2022). Conflict Data on Ethiopia.
Aregawi Berhe. (2009). A Political History of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (1975–1991): Revolt, Ideology and Mobilisation in Ethiopia. Tsehai Publishers.
Berhe, A. (2023). Postwar Tigray: Governance, Sovereignty, and the Politics of Survival. Horn of Africa Review Journal, 6(2), 88–105.
Berhe, A. (2023). The Political Aftershocks of the Pretoria Agreement. Journal of Modern African Studies, 61(2), 201–223.
Berhe, A. (2023). The UN and the Tigray War: Paralysis in a Multipolar World. Journal of Modern African Studies, 61(1), 45–67.
Berhe, M. G. (2023). The Tigray War: Geopolitics and Humanitarian Crisis. Journal of Modern African Studies.
Clapham, C. (2017). The Horn of Africa: State Formation and Decay. Hurst.
Clapham, C. (2021). The Horn of Africa: State Formation and Conflict. African Affairs, 120(479), 163–180.
Crummey, D. (2000). Land and Society in the Christian Kingdom of Ethiopia: From the Thirteenth to the Twentieth Century. University of Illinois Press.
de Waal, A. (2018). The Real Politics of the Horn of Africa: Money, War and the Business of Power. Polity.
de Waal, A. (2023). Ethiopia on the Brink: Collapse or Compromise? World Peace Foundation Report. Retrieved from: https://worldpeacefoundation.org
Ethiopian Human Rights Commission (EHRC). (2021). Report on Tigray Conflict Abuses.
EU Election Observation Mission (EU EOM). (2024). Preliminary Assessment on Ethiopia’s Electoral Preparedness. Brussels.
FDRE Constitution. (1995). Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Constitution. Proclamation No. 1/1995.
Gidey Gebreegziabher (2025). The Perpetual Conflict in Tigray: A Comprehensive Historical and Political Analysis. Tigrai Herlad, Journal.
Henze, P. B. (2000). Layers of Time: A History of Ethiopia. Palgrave Macmillan.
Human Rights Watch (HRW). (2022). Ethiopia: Atrocities in Tigray Must Be Investigated.
Human Rights Watch (HRW). (2022). We Will Erase You From This Land: Crimes Against Humanity and Ethnic Cleansing in Western Tigray, Ethiopia. Retrieved from: www.hrw.org
Human Rights Watch (HRW). (2024). Unresolved Atrocities in Ethiopia’s Peripheries: Patterns of Violence and Impunity. February 2024.
International Crisis Group (ICG). (2020). Ethiopia’s Tigray War: A Deadly Stalemate. Retrieved from: www.crisisgroup.org
International Crisis Group (ICG). (2021). Ethiopia’s Tigray War and Paths to Peace.
International Crisis Group (ICG). (2021). Finding a Path to Peace in Ethiopia’s Tigray Crisis.
International Crisis Group (ICG). (2023). Toward a Durable Peace in Ethiopia: Beyond Pretoria. Retrieved from: www.crisisgroup.org
International Crisis Group (ICG). (2023). Ethiopia’s Fragile Peace: Challenges After the Pretoria Agreement. Africa Report No. 314.
Kaplan, S. (2004). Themes and Characters in the Ethiopian Synaxarium. In G. Fiaccadori (Ed.), Christianity in the Horn of Africa: A Historical Appraisal. Università di Napoli “L’Orientale”.
Munro-Hay, S. C. (1991). Aksum: An African Civilization of Late Antiquity. Edinburgh University Press.
National Election Board of Ethiopia (NEBE). (2024). Electoral Preparedness and Regional Risks Report. April 2024.
Phillipson, D. W. (2012). Foundations of an African Civilisation: Aksum and the Northern Horn, 1000 BC – AD 1300. James Currey.
Plaut, M. (2022). The Horn of Africa: Conflict, Security, and Geopolitical Realignment. Hurst.
Reuters. (2022). How Turkish Drones Helped Turn the Tide in Ethiopia’s War. Retrieved from: www.reuters.com
Rubenson, S. (1976). The Survival of Ethiopian Independence. Heinemann.
Salt, H. (1814). A Voyage to Abyssinia and Travels into the Interior of that Country. F.C. & J. Rivington.
Tibebu, T. (1995). Ethiopia: The “Shining Beacon” of African Independence? Journal of World History.
Tigray Broadcasting Network (TBN). (2023). Salsay Weyane and the Path to SelfDetermination. June 2023.
Tigray Broadcasting Network (TBN). (2023). Salsay Weyane Demands Referendum on Tigray’s Independence. Broadcast, December 2023.
Tronvoll, K. & Aalen, L. (2022). Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia: Past Failures and Future Prospects. African Affairs, 121(484), 481–502.
Tronvoll, K. & Gedamu, S. (2022). Ethiopia’s Election Crisis and the Crisis of Federalism. African Affairs.
Vaughan, S. (2011). Revolutionary Democracy and the TPLF: A Profile of Party Ideology. In Ethiopia: The Challenge of Democracy from Below.
Verhoeven, H. (2022). The Gulf States in the Horn of Africa: Strategic Rivalry and Proxy Realignment. Oxford University Press.
Verhoeven, H. (2022). Water, War, and Geopolitics in the Horn of Africa. Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (2023). Aid Flows to Ethiopia and Budget Reallocations.
World Bank. (2023). Ethiopia Country Update: Misallocation of Recovery Funds and the Fiscal Crisis. Retrieved from: www.worldbank.org
World Bank. (2023). Ethiopia Economic Update: Overcoming Macroeconomic and Structural Challenges.
World Food Programme (WFP). (2023). Suspension of Aid Operations in Ethiopia After Diversion of Food Supplies. Internal Memo, July 2023.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Ethiopia: Health Emergency Appeal and Tigray Humanitarian Crisis Report. Retrieved from: www.who.int
Young, J. (1997). Peasant Revolution in Ethiopia: The Tigray People’s Liberation Front, 1975–1991. Cambridge University Press.
Zartman, W. (1995). Elusive Peace: Negotiating an End to Civil Wars. Brookings Institution Press.
